Denver Zoo Says New Sea Lion Exhibit Was Built Poorly, Leaks
The Denver Zoo’s new sea lion exhibit opened final summer season.
Denver Zoo
The Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance made a splash final May with a “brand-new, state-of-the-art habitat” for sea lionstogether with a sixteen-foot viewing window, salt water swimming pools and superior filtration system.
Less than one 12 months later, that very same exhibit has handled a number of leaks and cracked areas, rusty cages and {hardware}, and peeling paint within the animal meals preparation areas, in accordance with a lawsuit filed in Denver District Court by the Denver Zoological Foundation, the nonprofit group that operates the Denver Zoo.
The $19 million renovation took nearly two years to finish, with the 5 sea lions transferred to zoos throughout the nation within the meantime. But that course of was delayed and made dearer by design and development failures all through the method, in accordance with the Denver Zoo’s lawsuit in opposition to the designer, BRS Architecture, and Vertix Builders, which led the exhibit’s development.
According to the zoo, the ocean lions are secure and wholesome below present situations on the exhibit, which continues to be open to the general public; it says the lawsuit was filed to make sure the exhibit’s future for years to return.
In the swimsuit, the zoo claims design and specification failures by BRS Architecture led to rusty caging and {hardware}, a decreased pool measurement for the animals, inaccurate water ranges and better development prices. Designers additionally failed to offer acceptable specs for pool limitations, sump pumps and water purification, in accordance with the zoo’s attorneys with the Kutack Rock regulation agency.
“BRS failed to perform its services with the requisite professional skill and care and otherwise breached its obligations under the Design Contract,” the lawsuit claims. It goes on to say that BRS didn’t appropriate or resolve the problems, and wouldn’t reimburse the zoo “for the construction costs caused by its negligent errors and omissions, including but not limited to costs already incurred as a result of BRS’s failure to design the pool water level to original specifications.”
The challenge did not go a lot smoother when Vertix Builders stepped in as grasp contractor, in accordance with the swimsuit, which claims Vertix additionally “failed to perform its work in an efficient, good, and workmanlike manner and otherwise breached its obligations.”

Staffers have reported “active water seeing through cracks” of a basement wall beneath the ocean lion exhibit,” in accordance with the zoo. Its swimsuit additionally cites cracking in the principle and decrease seashores the place demonstrations and performances happen, free fiberglass polymer trim, uncovered concrete, “leaking” from a number of swimming pools, pipe failures and leakage, and salt water leaching within the moat space.
The poor development has resulted in paint peeling within the sea lion meals preparation space, in addition to rusty doorways and {hardware}, the swimsuit claims.
Zoo officers say they alerted BRS and Vertix of the design and development errors, however neither agency promptly corrected the defects. According to the lawsuit, agreements with each companies had stipulations in place for such repairs deemed vital by the zoo.
In an announcement to Westwordthe Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance says it’s “committed to resolving this matter as efficiently as possible, and to ensuring the habitat stands the test of time and meets the agreed-upon intent to provide our animals with a high-quality environment.”
“Some of the design and construction issues in the complaint remain, and some have been corrected. It’s important to note that there are no immediate health or safety concerns for the animals,” the zoo’s assertion provides. “Our goal is to resolve these issues as efficiently as possible to ensure the long-term sustainability of the facility.”
The Denver Zoo is searching for damages from each corporations, with the quantity to be decided at trial.
Vertix and BRS haven’t responded to requests for remark.
