ChatGPT allegedly advised Florida State shooter when and where to strike
SAN FRANCISCO – Florida’s legal professional common introduced a prison investigation of ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, alleging the corporate’s chatbot advised the person accused of killing two individuals in a capturing at Florida State University final yr which ammunition to use and where and when to strike.
“The chatbot advised the shooter on what type of gun to use, on which ammo went with which gun, on whether or not a gun would be useful at short range,” Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier stated at a information convention Tuesday. “If it was a person on the other end of that screen, we would be charging them with murder.”
Uthmeier’s workplace despatched subpoenas to OpenAI on Tuesday, asking for the unreal intelligence firm’s insurance policies on how to reply when its customers make threats to hurt others throughout conversations with ChatGPT, in accordance to a press release. The prison investigation introduced Tuesday follows a civil investigation Uthmeier introduced this month.
“Last year’s mass shooting at Florida State University was a tragedy, but ChatGPT is not responsible for this terrible crime,” OpenAI spokesperson Kate Waters stated. “After learning of the incident, we identified a ChatGPT account believed to be associated with the suspect and proactively shared this information with law enforcement.”
ChatGPT offered “factual responses to questions with information that could be found broadly across public sources on the internet, and it did not encourage or promote illegal or harmful activity,” Waters stated. (The Washington Post has a content material partnership with OpenAI.)
Two individuals had been killed and six others injured within the capturing at Florida State in Tallahassee final April after a school scholar opened hearth on campus, authorities stated on the time. The suspected shooter, Phoenix Ikner, was shot by police who had swarmed to the campus and was later hospitalized. Ikner has been charged with a number of counts of homicide and tried homicide.
“ChatGPT advised the shooter on what time of day would be appropriate for the shooting to interact with more people and where on campus would be the place to encounter a higher population,” Uthmeier stated on the Tuesday information convention.
OpenAI faces intense scrutiny from legislation enforcement and elected officers after authorities alleged that the shooter in Florida and suspect in a February mass capturing in Canada that killed 9 individuals mentioned their intention to hurt others in conversations with ChatGPT. Several households of people that died by suicide have filed lawsuits claiming the chatbot contributed to the deaths of their family members.
The tragic incidents have fueled a debate about what tasks AI corporations have to monitor person conversations and flag regarding ones to legislation enforcement.
In a December 2025 doc outlining how its AI fashions function, OpenAI stated that it has a system to monitor and mechanically flag conversations that may point out a person is planning to hurt somebody to their human reviewers. Those reviewers then determined whether or not to escalate the scenario to police. It is unclear whether or not the FSU shooter’s conversations triggered human assessment by OpenAI.
AI corporations prepare their chatbots not to reply questions with offensive content material or info that could possibly be used to hurt individuals, however the nature of how the know-how works means it’s tough to predict how a chatbot could react in each doable situation, stated Ramayya Krishnan, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University who has advised the White House and Department of Defense on AI coverage and governance. “The guardrails are not 100 percent effective.”
Concerns about AI’s impression on individuals and on the economic system have gotten political points, and Florida’s legal professional common and its governor, Ron DeSantis, have expressed their very own skepticism in regards to the AI trade.
The state has additionally grow to be a battleground in a rising break up throughout the Republican Party over how to regulate AI. DeSantis pushed the state’s legislature to cross an “AI bill of rights” that might have instituted a sequence of limits on how corporations might use AI in client merchandise, however after opposition from President Donald Trump, legislators didn’t cross the invoice.
Related Content
