US-Iran peace talks stall. What’s next for global markets
A dealer works on the ground on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, US, April 16, 2026.
Jeenah Moon | Reuters
Global markets are coming into the week balancing resilient threat urge for food in opposition to renewed geopolitical pressure as prospects of US-Iran negotiations took successful over the weekend.
U.S. President Donald Trump scrapped plans to ship envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner to Islamabad for talks with Iran on Saturday, citing “tremendous infighting and confusion” inside Tehran’s management.
Though uncertainty looms giant, Iran has offered a new proposal to the US for reopening the Strait of Hormuz and ending the battle whereas suggesting that nuclear talks be deferred, Axios reported Monday, citing a US official and two sources with information of the matter.
Signaling that makes an attempt to safe a deal had been nonetheless ongoing, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi made a short return to Islamabad on Sunday as Pakistan’s leaders push to revive talks between Tehran and Washington — although Trump mentioned discussions could instead take place over the phone. Araghchi has Islamabad reportedly departed for Moscow.
Amid lingering uncertainty over the vital power waterway and the Iran battle, oil costs inched greater Monday, reinforcing a persistent threat premium in power markets.
International benchmark Brent oil futures rose round 1% to $106.55 per barrel whereas US crude oil added 0.88% to $95.23 per barrel.
US oil costs because the begin of the yr
Goldman Sachs now expects oil costs to remain greater for longer, elevating its Brent forecast to $90 a barrel by late 2026 from $80 beforehand, as disruptions within the Persian Gulf show extra persistent than earlier assumed.
The financial institution wrote in a notice revealed Monday that delayed normalization in Gulf exports, now anticipated solely by end-June, alongside a slower manufacturing restoration is tightening provide sharply, with global inventories estimated to be drawing at a document tempo of 11 million barrels per day to 12 mbd in April.
The financial institution’s view is echoed by different market watchers. “I’d argue the fat tail is still ahead of us, not behind,” mentioned Billy Leung, funding strategist at Global X ETFs. Fat tail refers to likelihood of utmost occasions.
Even if flows through Hormuz finally resume, the lag in restoring provide, mixed with depleted inventories, suggests sustained tightness. Global funding administration agency Invesco estimates that $80 per barrel is probably going a ground for Brent this yr absent a full normalization of flows.
Experts warned that the longer the strait stays disrupted, the extra acute the financial impression turns into, with rising costs finally forcing demand destruction, notably in energy-importing areas.
Stocks: resilient for now
Equities have to date proven stunning resilience, with global markets having recovered losses sustained in the preliminary outbreak of the battle, hovering close to document highs regardless of the continuing power shock.
Analysts say that this displays a tug-of-war between geopolitical dangers and powerful structural drivers, notably synthetic intelligence.
“Equities are essentially balancing two opposing forces: geopolitical left tails on one side, the AI commercialization right tail on the other, and now the right tail is winning convincingly,” mentioned Leung.
Still, some warning that the sentiment is changing into stretched.
“The primary trend is up and I’d respect that, but I wouldn’t be chasing here either. Sentiment is hot, positioning is crowded, and elevated readings have historically preceded softer forward returns,” Leung mentioned.
Others see volatility as a shopping for alternative. Rajat Bhattacharya, senior funding strategist at Standard Chartered, mentioned near-term market swings are possible however anticipate a deal inside weeks that might restore flows.
“Any near-term volatility presents investors with an opportunity to add to risk assets within a diversified allocation,” he mentioned.
Historical precedent additionally suggests markets can get well rapidly from provide shocks. Ed Yardeni, economist and president at Yardeni Research, famous that oil costs doubled and shares fell through the 1956 Suez disaster however later rebounded to new highs as soon as the canal reopened.
Asia-Pacific inventory gained on Monday, with Japan’s Nikkei 225 and South Korea’s Kospi notching new document highs whereas US inventory futures had been largely secure, suggesting restricted spillover from the weekend’s developments.
Government bond markets had been secure with the 10-year yield on US Treasurys up 1 foundation level at 4.322%. whereas yield on similar length Japan authorities bonds was over 2 foundation factors greater at 2.463%.
Commodities, meals and second-order results
Beyond oil, the broader commodity advanced is starting to mirror deeper and extra persistent disruptions: notably in pure gasoline and meals provide chains.
“LNG is the under-discussed leg here,” mentioned Leung. “European benchmarks are running about a third above pre-war levels with roughly a fifth of global LNG supply choked off.”
Higher gasoline costs feed instantly into fertilizer manufacturing and agricultural prices, elevating the danger of a delayed however sustained improve in meals costs.
“The food chain pressure builds with a lag, so the headline CPI prints from this won’t show up immediately,” he added. “Agricultural inputs and shipping insurance are where I’d watch the second-order effects develop over the next quarter.”
Invesco additionally flagged that disruptions lengthen past oil, affecting items corresponding to helium, aluminum and sulfur.
That broadens the inflationary impression throughout industrial provide chains, doubtlessly complicating coverage responses whilst central banks stay inclined to look by the shock for now, Invesco’s global head of analysis Benjamin Jones wrote in a notice on Monday.
As Leung put it: “The bull market is intact … but the tape is balancing genuine technological upside against an energy shock that hasn’t fully played out.”
