Nicola Coughlan is right: ‘body positivity’ traps us in the same old conversations | Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett
Nicola Coughlan is sick of the topic of “body positivity”, and thank God, as a result of so am I. “The thing I say sometimes that pisses people off is I have no interest in body positivity,” she mentioned in a latest interview. Like Coughlan and little question many, many different girls, I’m sick of speaking about it, excited about it, studying about it, all of it (I do acknowledge a sure irony in my writing about it, however hear me out). in the same interviewCoughlan recounted an encounter with a fan: “I remember this really drunk girl once talking to me in a bathroom being like, ‘I loved [Bridgerton] because of your body’ and started talking about my body, and I was like, ‘I want to die. I hate this so much.’”
She continued: “It’s really hard when you work on something for months and months of your life, you don’t see your family, you really dedicate yourself and then it comes down to what you look like – it’s so fucking boring.”
Coughlan – an excellent actor – has been significantly unlucky, in that her physique is the speaking level that won’t go away her alone. Even at occasions when, as she identified, she is a measurement 10, she is nonetheless talked about as “plus-sized”. In some methods, it jogs my memory of Kate Winslet in the early days of her fame. The tone of the dialog is totally different; Winslet was subjected to the cruel misogyny and body fascism of 1990s mediawhereas Coughlan is held up as a “body-positive role model” as a part of a pushback in opposition to it. Yet each actors have confronted an analogous battle: eager to do good work that they care about in their chosen artwork kind, and discovering that everybody appears to need to speak about is their supposedly “atypical” our bodies.
Coughlan and I are of the same technology, and so each got here of age throughout the interval when Winslet was being viciously body-shamed. It was not a great time to turn out to be a younger girl, and a few of us have fared higher than others in coming to phrases with that period and the affect on our shallowness of ruthless, internalized self-scrutiny.
That’s why the body-positivity motion most just lately popularized throughout fourth-wave feminism was welcomed with open arms. After years of shaming and fatphobia, right here was a motion that celebrated girls’s our bodies in all their various magnificence. I discovered it inspiring, however over time I started to appreciate that it by no means actually succeeded in silencing that just about fixed, self-hating background hum that got here from years of being socialized into solely seeing your personal flaws.
To me, physique positivity felt like one thing different girls appeared to be excelling at – prefer it was one more normal to satisfy. Loudly loving my physique did not really feel like a sensible aim to try in the direction of. Maybe on some degree I knew that the stress to like my physique was in itself a directive to suppose an excessive amount of about it, when true liberation regarded like not having to consider my physique in any respect. Maybe it was much less about loving it, and easily about studying to reside with it peacefully.
Surely, true liberation was directing your power elsewhere, in the direction of making artwork, doing politics, loving folks and the planet? One of the most heartbreaking issues about the poisonous overemphasis on girls’s our bodies is the way it chips away at every thing else that makes life significant. Coughlan’s frustration is my frustration, too: all that point and power, when all of us could possibly be doing one thing a lot extra worthwhile.
That appears to be the case whichever means the pendulum is swinging, from physique negativity to physique positivity, and again once more. At the second, physique positivity is on the wane, plus-sized fashions are shedding work, and we appear to be returning to a Nineteen Nineties worshiping of ultra-thinness, made all the extra prevalent as a consequence of the rise of weight-loss injections. Presumably after that we are going to have one other backlash. I simply do not suppose I’ve it in me to interact. As Coughlan says, it is fucking boring. Whether we’re speaking about physique negativity or physique positivity, we’re nonetheless speaking about the physique at the expense of every thing else. What we ought to be striving for is physique neutrality. Body acceptance. That is the place the actual freedom lies.
We all get there, or begin transferring in the direction of it, in alternative ways. Perhaps it is giving delivery, turning into significantly unwell, or seeing your physique obtain a feat of endurance. I’d characterize it as a form of detailed respect and appreciation for what your physique can do, as the automobile that strikes you thru the world.
When I used to be writing my novel Female, Nude, in which my characters wrestle with these questions, I attended a whole lot of life drawing lessons for analysis. As an train in studying physique neutrality, there is nothing higher. If I had a younger daughter, that is what I might advocate. At first, you may take a look at the life mannequin and see the types of “flaws” that may be disappeared on-line at the contact of a button – the fats of her higher arm when it is pressed in opposition to her aspect; the again folds from the slight flip of a torso; cellulite. Then one thing occurs: the physique dissolves right into a collection of strains and curves. The act of observing turns into indifferent, and the human physique turns into a truth, nothing extra. Instead of fixed, tedious dialogue about the feminine physique, really, correctly and uncritically wanting at it feels, to me, like a transfer in the direction of equilibrium and hopefully, freedom. It’s a course of, however Coughlan’s refreshing angle jogs my memory to maintain making an attempt.
Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett is a Guardian columnist and creator of Female, Nude
Do you could have an opinion on the points raised in this text? If you want to submit a response of as much as 300 phrases by e mail to be thought of for publication in our letters part, please click here.
