Green Bay Packers urge Congress to preserve Sports Broadcasting Act protections
GREEN BAY, Wis. (WBAY) – The Green Bay Packers are asking Congress to preserve key protections within the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961 (SBA) because the House Judiciary Committee critiques the decades-old regulation that permits the NFL and its groups to negotiate nationwide broadcast rights collectively.
In a March 26 letter to Rep. Scott Fitzgerald (R-Wis.), chair of the House Judiciary Committee’s Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust Subcommittee, Packers Director of Public Affairs Aaron Popkey stated the SBA has been important to the crew’s long-term viability — significantly because the NFL’s smallest-market franchise and the one publicly owned crew in American skilled sports activities.
The Packers argued that the present broadcast construction helps income sharing that helps stabilize all groups no matter market measurement, serving to keep aggressive steadiness throughout the league.
“The shared revenue that we speak of and how that allows the Packers to survive. You know, when we speak to the committee and the team and the people working on it, that’s where the concern is,” Popkey stated.
The letter warns that altering the SBA’s core framework might dramatically widen monetary gaps between groups in main media markets and smaller markets like Green Bay.
According to the Packers, if groups had been compelled into unbiased broadcast negotiations, the worth of media rights would probably focus in massive markets, undermining monetary fairness and making it tough for small-market groups to compete.
Popkey wrote that eliminating the NFL’s capability to negotiate broadcast rights collectively would pose an “existential threat” to the Packers’ continued existence in Green Bay “as we know it,” whereas additionally making it harder for followers to watch Packers video games.
“We’ve talked to some of them and some of their teams to make sure they understand the concerns that we have, and, you know, to that point, we haven’t received any assurances. Again, it’s being discussed, but it’s a lot of hypotheticals. And that is the existential threat to the Packers,” Popkey stated. “If the SBA goes away, what assurances are there that the structure remains in place that allows the Packers to survive That’s the existential threat. And I think that’s what all Packers fans should be concerned about.”
The Packers additionally emphasised their position as a “critical economic and cultural driver” for his or her neighborhood, area, and the state of Wisconsin — saying the SBA’s framework has helped the franchise stay viable and aggressive whereas staying in Green Bay.
“Just the success of the NFL is due to the ability to share the revenue that comes from these types of contracts, and that makes the NFL strong, and it makes great stories like the Green Bay Packers able to exist,” Popkey stated.
As the committees weigh a possible listening to or adjustments to the Act, the group urged to contemplate how alterations might have an effect on NFL groups’ aggressive operations.
The Packers stated they’d welcome additional discussions with Fitzgerald and different committee members concerning the SBA and its affect on the crew’s heritage and the state.
The letter copied a number of members of Wisconsin’s congressional delegation, together with Reps. Tony Wied, Glenn Grothman, Gwen Moore, Mark Pocan, Derrick Van Orden, Tom Tiffany, and Sens. Tammy Baldwin and Ron Johnson.
Action 2 News has reached out to Rep. Fitzgerald and Rep. Grothman concerning the letter, however we have now not but heard again.
Copyright 2026 WBAY. All rights reserved.
