Trump warns Iran ceasefire ‘1% chance of living’ as US weighs military options

president donald trump warned Monday that the delicate ceasefire between the US and Iran could also be on the verge of collapse, casting new urgency over what a renewed battle might appear to be as negotiations look like breaking down over Tehran’s nuclear program.

“I would say the ceasefire is on massive life support where the doctor walks in and says, ‘Sir, your loved one has approximately a 1% chance of living,'” Trump informed reporters, signaling deep skepticism that present diplomacy will maintain.

The feedback got here after Trump rejected an Iranian-backed proposal that centered on ending the US blockade whereas delaying harder negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear program — an method the administration seems to view as unacceptable.

IRAN’S REMAINING WEAPONS: HOW TEHRAN CAN STILL DISRUPT THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ

“I have a plan. Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon,” Trump mentioned within the Oval Office.

Trump additionally mentioned US officers believed Iran had beforehand agreed to relinquish its stockpile of enriched uranium — a key demand within the talks — however that Iran’s newest response omitted any reference to the difficulty, elevating issues the Iranian place might have shifted.

At the identical time, Trump advised divisions inside Iran’s management could possibly be complicating negotiations, describing factions inside the regime as break up between “moderates and lunatics.”

The breakdown highlights how rapidly the present ceasefire might unravel — and the way quickly the US might pivot again to military options if diplomacy fails.

If negotiations with Iran collapse, the US might transfer rapidly again to assaults on Iran’s military capabilities — a marketing campaign analysts say it will start with missile techniques, naval belongings and command networks earlier than escalating to extra controversial targets.

Negotiators are nonetheless working towards what officers describe as a preliminary framework settlement — successfully a one-page place to begin for broader talks centered on Iran’s nuclear program and potential sanctions reduction. But deep distrust on either side has left the method fragile, elevating the stakes if diplomacy fails.

“We’re not starting at zero,” retired Army Col. Seth Krummrich, a former Joint Staff planner and present Vice President at Global Guardian, informed Fox News Digital. “We’re both starting at minus 1,000 because neither side trusts each other at all. This is going to be a pretty hard process going forward.”

That rigidity was on show Thursday, when a senior US official confirmed American forces struck Iran’s Qeshm port and Bandar Abbas — key areas close to the Strait of Hormuz — whereas insisting the operation didn’t mark a restart of the conflict or the tip of the fireplace stop.

The strike on one of Iran’s oil ports got here two days after Iran launched 15 ballistic and cruise missiles on the UAE’s Fujairah Port, drawing anger from Gulf allies. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine mentioned earlier this week the assault didn’t rise to the extent of breaking the ceasefire, describing it as a low-level strike.

Trump has repeatedly warned that if negotiations collapse, the US might resume bombing Iran — even signaling earlier than the current ceasefire was carried out that Washington might goal the nation’s vitality infrastructure and key financial belongings. But any escalation would possible unfold in phases, starting with efforts to dismantle Iran’s skill to venture drive throughout the area earlier than increasing to extra controversial targets.

If talks break down, any renewed battle would possible grow to be a “contest for escalation control,” the place Iran seeks to impose prices with out frightening regime-threatening retaliation whereas the US works to strip away Tehran’s remaining leverage, in line with retired Air Force Lt. Gen. David Deptula.

“The capabilities that would come into focus are the ones Iran uses to generate coercive leverage: ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, air defense systems, maritime strike assets, command-and-control networks, IRGC infrastructure, proxy support channels, and nuclear-related facilities,” he mentioned, referring to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps.

“The military objective would be less about punishment and more about denying Iran the tools it uses to escalate,” he mentioned.

“President Trump has all the cards, and he wisely keeps all options on the table to ensure that Iran can never possess a nuclear weapon,” White House spokesperson Olivia Wales informed Fox News Digital.

The Pentagon couldn’t instantly be reached for remark.

One early focus could possibly be Iran’s fleet of quick assault boats within the Strait of Hormuz — a central element of Tehran’s skill to threaten international delivery in a single of the world’s most important vitality corridors.

RP Newman, a military and terrorism analyst and Marine Corps veteran, mentioned leaving a lot of that fleet intact throughout earlier strikes was a mistake.

“We’ve blown up six of them,” he mentioned. “They’ve got about 400 left.”

The small, fast-moving boats are a key half of Iran’s uneven maritime technique, succesful of harassing industrial tankers and US naval forces — and will rapidly grow to be a precedence goal in any renewed marketing campaign.

Much of Iran’s core military construction additionally stays intact.

INSIDE IRAN’S MILITARY: MISSILES, MILITIAS AND A FORCE BUILT FOR SURVIVAL

Newman mentioned “we’ve only killed less than one percent of IRGC troops,” leaving a big portion of the drive nonetheless succesful of finishing up operations. He estimated the group “numbers between 150 and 190,000.”

But focusing on the IRGC is way extra advanced than eliminating senior management.

“They’re not just a group of leaders at the top that you can kill away,” Krummrich mentioned. “Over 47 years it’s percolated down to every level.”

An excavator removes rubble on the website of a strike that destroyed half of the Khorasaniha Synagogue and close by residential buildings in Tehran, Iran, on April 7, 2026, in line with a safety official on the scene. (Francisco Seco/AP)

Retired Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery, a senior fellow on the Foundation for Defense of Democracies coverage institute, mentioned Washington might proceed tightening financial stress earlier than broadening military motion, arguing the US ought to “squeeze them for at least another three to six weeks” earlier than contemplating extra aggressive escalation.

“You could have blown Kharg Island back to smithereens,” Krummrich mentioned, referring to Iran’s main oil export terminal within the Persian Gulf. “But what the planner said was, no — what we can do is a maritime blockade. It will have the same effect.”

Iran has continued shifting crude by coated delivery networks and ship-to-ship transfers, with tanker trackers reporting thousands and thousands of barrels nonetheless reaching markets in current weeks.

A CIA evaluation discovered Iran might be able to maintain these pressures for an additional three to 4 months earlier than going through extra extreme financial pressure, in line with a report by The Washington Post.

The query is how far a US marketing campaign might broaden if preliminary stress fails to drive concessions.

Trump has signaled a willingness to go additional, warning earlier than the ceasefire that the US might “completely obliterate” Iran’s electrical producing crops, oil infrastructure and key export hubs such as Kharg Island if a deal is just not reached.

Strikes on the Iranian management, the IRGC, and Iranian naval vessels and oil infrastructure have roiled the markets. (Sasan/Middle East Images/AFP by way of Getty Images)

“You don’t do that at first,” Montgomery mentioned, describing strikes on dual-use infrastructure as a conditional step depending on Iran’s response.

Targeting dual-use infrastructure presents important authorized and operational challenges.

“I’ve got 500 people standing on my target. You can’t hit that,” Newman mentioned.

Such selections carry political and authorized dangers, notably given the chance of worldwide scrutiny.

Broader infrastructure strikes additionally might create long-term instability in the event that they push Iran towards inner collapse.

“In the short term, it might help. But in the long term, we’re all going to have to deal with it,” Krummrich mentioned. “Once you pull that lever, you’re basically pushing Iran closer to the edge of the abyss.”

A collapse of state authority might create a failed-state situation throughout the Strait of Hormuz, with armed teams, drones and missiles working unchecked in a single of the world’s most strategically necessary waterways.

Even some of probably the most mentioned military options — such as seizing Iran’s extremely enriched uranium — could be extraordinarily troublesome to execute.

“That’s much harder than it sounds,” mentioned Montgomery.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Such a mission would possible take months, and require engineers, technicians and heavy excavation gear, along with hundreds of US operators offering steady air protection.

“When you start to stack that up, that becomes resource intensive and high risk — not even high, extreme risk,” Krummrich mentioned.