OPM’s Kupor defends Schedule Policy/Career, as finalization nears
As the Trump administration’s Schedule Policy/Career nears finalization, Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor reaffirmed his view that the pending personnel change is centered on “accountability,” relatively than politicization.
The OPM director pushed again in opposition to criticisms from the federal neighborhood, after many warned of a return to a patronage system within the profession civil service if the brand new federal employment classification is finalized.
“I think most federal employees know this — and certainly all the ones I’ve encountered have had no problem with this — your job is ultimately to effect legal actions that the president determines are the appropriate objectives for the organization,” Kupor stated throughout a March 5 occasion hosted by Federal News Network. “That’s what this does — basically codify what essentially has always been the practice of the executive branch.”
Tens of 1000’s of federal workers are on track to quickly be transformed to the brand new Schedule Policy/Career class, leaving them with restricted attraction rights and making it simpler for companies to fireside them. But as soon as the coverage takes impact, other than receiving notification of the reclassification, Kupor stated “nothing else happens” for profession federal workers.
“Now you’re under a different designation, and business will be as usual,” Kupor stated.
“But if any of those individuals ultimately determines that they’re unwilling or uninterested in pursuing the policies of the administration … then they potentially could be removed by people in that organization,” he added.
OPM’s Feb. 6 final rule particulars most of the adjustments that profession workers in “policy-influencing” positions would see as a results of their reclassification. When it involves whistleblower coverage, as an example, affected workers could be topic to an inner company course of relatively than going to the impartial Office of Special Counsel. Reclassified workers would additionally lose eligibility for recruitment, retention and relocation pay incentives, as effectively as pupil mortgage reimbursement choices.
All informed, many within the federal neighborhood have raised concerns of a “chilling effect” on the profession civil service and an erosion of the non-partisan nature of the workforce — finally resulting in deteriorating federal providers and a lack of experience at companies.
Kupor, nonetheless, emphasised the significance of profession workers adhering to the president’s insurance policies.
“In all the interactions I’ve had with federal employees, they recognize and understand that every four years, for better or worse, whether they like it or not, whether they voted for this president or they didn’t, their job is ultimately to effect the policies of that administration,” he stated. “If someone says, ‘I have such a discordant view of what the president is doing that I literally am going to direct my people not to do what the president has lawfully instructed us to do,’ then I think it’s totally reasonable for the American people that that person should not be in the organization.”
About 94% of public comments OPM obtained on its rules for Schedule Policy/Career had been against the administration’s proposed change. Just about 5% of commenters supported the coverage, and 1% had been impartial or combined, in response to OPM’s personal evaluation.
“We’re not saying don’t disagree with the president — everyone has the right to do that,” Kupor stated, when requested about his response to the criticisms. “What we’re saying is, if your disagreement then causes you to not fulfill your duties as an employee of the American people and do the things that the lawfully elected president has asked you to do, then, quite frankly, in my mind, the honorable thing to do is either resign from that position, or potentially face removal if you’re in this Policy/Career position.”
Performance system adjustments forward
At the identical time, OPM has additionally been pushing ahead different efforts to change personnel coverage for the profession federal workforce — together with by means of a current proposal to vary the federal government’s efficiency administration system.
In February, OPM proposed regulations to take away a present ban on a pressured distribution system — one thing that would ultimately result in companies limiting what number of federal workers will be rated as excessive performers of their annual efficiency evaluations.
Kupor stated the pending adjustments come again to what he sees as inflation of efficiency rankings throughout the federal workforce. He pointed to 2013 information from the Government Accountability Office, exhibiting that the overwhelming majority of federal workers had been rated as acting at or above expectations of their evaluations, whereas nearly 0.3% had been rated “below expectations.”
“I just have a hard time believing that accurately reflects what the performance of the organization is,” Kupor stated. “It creates, in my mind, very, very perverse incentives, and the absence of what I think we would want to have in any environment, which is a high-performance culture.”
For federal workers who’re thought-about “poor performers” in authorities, Kupor stated companies ought to attempt to “rehabilitate” them, by offering suggestions and placing them on efficiency enchancment plans.
“But in some cases, those people may ultimately, unfortunately, have to be removed from their organization in the federal government,” Kupor stated. “If someone actually is not capable of doing what we need them to do, a manager needs the ability to remove that person.”
Relatedly, Kupor stated OPM can also be regulatory adjustments to make it simpler to take away federal workers who’re rated as poor performers and deemed unable to enhance.
“It’s extremely difficult, even for people who are not performing, to be removed from the organization,” he stated. “It takes a very long time. It is a very long process.”
The Trump administration has already carried out limitations for efficiency rankings for profession Senior Executive Service members and others in senior-level positions. OPM finalized rules in September 2025 to take away a ban on pressured distributions for SES efficiency evaluations, and put a 30% cap on the portion of senior executives who will be rated within the high two classes of the federal government’s efficiency ranking scale. The rules don’t restrict what number of senior executives will be rated within the center and decrease tier classes.
Last 12 months, the Trump administration additionally changed the performance criteria for senior executives, making adherence to the president’s insurance policies the “most critical element” to be thought-about of their annual efficiency evaluations.
Going ahead, Kupor expressed curiosity in transferring towards performance-based financial incentives, by giving no less than 60% of the funding put aside for worker bonuses to those that are rated within the high two tiers of the efficiency analysis scale.
“We believe that if we have people who are truly outperforming, we ought to demonstrate that we value that outperformance by giving them compensation,” Kupor stated. “If we create a high-performance culture, we can attract, retain and recruit people who truly want to be in a place where, when they do great work, that work is rewarded.”
If you want to contact this reporter about current adjustments within the federal authorities, please e-mail drew.friedman@federalnewsnetwork.com or attain out on Signal at drewfriedman.11
Copyright © 2026 Federal News Network. All rights reserved. This web site isn’t supposed for customers positioned throughout the European Economic Area.
